home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: access4.digex.net!not-for-mail
- From: ell@access4.digex.net (Ell)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Visual C++ V4.0 books
- Date: 18 Feb 1996 23:50:08 GMT
- Organization: The Universe
- Message-ID: <4g8dvg$7do@news4.digex.net>
- References: <00001a81+0000a00a@msn.com> <3120f49e.29261482@news.atl.mindspring.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access4.digex.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- Jim McFarland (smallmac@mindspring.com) wrote:
- : On 13 Feb 96 08:27:19 -0800, KMays@msn.com (Kenneth Mays) wrote:
- : >Borland is stuck with OWL for now and I ask, why should we suffer
- : >with a hacked up library system (OWL) when we can get a standard that
- : >won't change drastically vall at the drop of tea. I won't buy Borland
- : >C++ V5.0.0, i'd rather have Mocrosoft Visual V4.0.
- : >
-
- : What makes you think MFC isn't also constantly changing?
-
- Believe me MFC has been having pretty important changes with every
- release. MFC 4.0 has pretty drastic changes from the last release. For
- one, application startup code has been revamped. Next the .dll model has
- totally changed. Read the Dec. '95 MS Systems Journal for more on
- MFC changes since the first release.
-
- Elliott
-